One possible solution to respond to the problems would be a proposal by The Hamilton Project. The Hamilton Project details sound solutions for evolving beyond traditional employer-sponsored health insurance. The main tenants of their proposal include:
A. State established "insurance exchanges" B. Shift employers traditional role as sponsor to facilitator of coverage C. Reform of the tax laws to more fairly handle the needs of our needy
A. A state insurance exchange can be thought of as a stock exchange on Wall Street. Although the insurance exchange would not exist to make money Wholesale Jerseys Cheap , it would serve to bring together the major players in health care; insurance companies, regulators, and consumers. A series of state determined minimums could be established as the ground rules and those insurance carriers wanting participation can sign on to compete with their various products. Care must be taken not to create any new regulation, enlarging the already oversized bureaucracy and costs. A simple mandate that ERISA approved health plans would also meet exchange minimums should be enough.
B. Instead of employers Wholesale Jerseys Online , small to medium sized businesses in particular, sponsoring health insurance plans with their typically small risk pools and high premiums; they could act as facilitators as their employees gain access to their respective state health exchanges. The employee and his or her family may now have access to a wide array of health plan options which would be more likely to fit their unique health care needs. A younger couple may elect a high deductible cheaper policy while a single woman in her early 60's may require a low deductible plan.
As facilitators, the employer would deduct the required premiums from their employee's paychecks and transfer that to the health exchange, which in turn Wholesale Jerseys Free Shipping , would pay the respective insurance company direct. Employers are used to this role already when it comes to deducting taxes and other benefit elections for employees such as 401K contributions or health savings accounts.
As employees change jobs much more often in our postindustrial service economy, their health coverage would remain intact since their previous employer merely acted as a facilitator. If their new job participates in the insurance exchange of that state, it's a simple administrative change for the continued collection of premiums. An individual or family without work could have premium payments deducted from state unemployment compensation or simply pay the exchange direct for continued or new coverage alike. Simple automatic deductions from a bank account or even a credit card could suffice as payment.
It was by accident that our health insurance became so rooted in our employers and bringing us a whole host of concerns for us to ponder before switching jobs or on termination:
1. Can we afford to lose our health insurance as we endure the new employers waiting period for another policy? 2. Can we afford the high cost of COBRA health insurance during the transition? 3. Will our trusted family physician be equally accessible on my new employers sponsored health plan? 4. Does my new employer even offer health insurance and if not how many months of COBRA continuation coverage can we afford? 5. Will a previous ailment be considered a preexisting condition with our next provider of care and therefore disqualify me for coverage altogether?
All these concerns would be eliminated by providing this alternative to employer sponsored health insurance. Larger firms may still desire to offer their ERISA approved health benefits and that would be just fine. As previously mentioned, how we became so heavily reliant on our employers for our health insurance when we handle most other insurance needs on our own was incidental. From The Hamilton Project's report Wholesale Jerseys From China , page ,7# Box #1:
Wage controls imposed during World War II, which gave employers the incentive to offer, and employees to accept Wholesale Jerseys China , uncontrolled fringe benefits, including health coverage, because benefits were not subject to controls A series of tax rulings, later codified in the landmark 1954 federal tax law Wholesale Jerseys , which exempted such benefits from taxation, providing a major tax advantage for employer-sponsored coverage A 1948 ruling by the National Labor Relations Board that health benefits were a legitimate subject of collective bargaining, further spurring the growth of employment-based coverage, especially in unionized firms. C. Tax laws presently favor employers and upper income earners because of the lack of any cap on an employer's contributions to health plans. Employers receive a tax deduction for contributing to an employee's health coverage costs. Unlike other employee compensation benefits Cheap Baseball Jerseys , there is no limit on this exclusion. Therefore, the greater the coverage selected, the greater the tax break from Uncle Sam. The total revenue loss realized with this tax treatment in 2006 was said to be 208.6 billion dollars alone.
The bias in the disbursement of these 208 billion dollars exists because unless your employer offers coverage you can't even touch the lucrative tax break. In addition, as stated above Cheap MLB Jerseys , the tax break is skewed to those in higher compensated jobs. The average annual tax subsidy for covered employees was $2778 in 2006. Low wage earners, those making less than $10.43 an hour, realized a subsidy of only $2268, while on the high-end Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping , those earning more than $23.07 an hour, realized average subsidies of $3283. In essence, those who need the help the most don't get it while those that seemingly need less aid receive the most tax benefit.